Walking: Search & Demographic Trends (Part 1 of 2)

Posted on February 16th, 2010 in Analytics, General, SEO, keywording, lookstat, microstock | 5 Comments »

Walking for exercise was the most popular activity in terms of number of participants and was in the top ten when it came to year over year growth on our list of top leisure activities. Given an aging population, and a tough economy, it’s not surprising that walking is a popular leisure activity. To provide some context, in 2008, there were 96.6 million people who participated in ‘walking’ compared to ‘golf’ which had 25.5 million participants. Also, the number of walkers in 2008 was 11% higher than it was in 2007 which saw 89.9 million participants.

This will be a two part series. In this post, I’m going to look at:

  • Demographic & Gender Trends for Walking in the USA
  • Footwear Spending by Category
  • Walking Shoe Purchasers by Age & Gender
  • Top Search Keywords

The second post will focus on stock photography related to ‘walking’ and will link back to this one.

Participation by Gender

Source: NSGA, Statistical Abstract of the USA

Participation by Age

Source: NSGA, Statistical Abstract of the USA

Walking as a means of exercise clearly skews older (49% of participants 45 or older) and female (62.5% female). This data is also supported by the footwear spending data as you’ll see below.

Footwear Spending by Type of Shoe

Walking shoes accounted for 33% of the $12.5 billion dollars spent on footwear in 2007 (data for 2008 were projected to be similar and 2009 data are not available yet but if anything, I’d expect this to be more pronounced.)

Walking shoe Purchasers by Gender & Age

Digging into the walking shoe purchasers show that the same trends apply as the overall participation in walking. 45-64 is the biggest age group and the percentage of female users is identical to the percentage of female walkers.

Search Trends for Walking & Walking Shoes

The chart below shows data from Google Insights for ‘exercise walking’ and ‘walking shoes’ from 2008 to 2010.

There isn’t much seasonality, but ‘walking shoes’ are searched for 5 times more often than ‘exercise walking.’ This surprised me initially, but intuitively it makes sense that people would be searching for ‘walking shoes’ as opposed to for ‘exercise walking.’ The same caveats as those in our comments on running shoes apply – be careful of trademarked designs & logos.

Top Searches Related to ‘Exercise Walking’

Conclusions

  • Walking for exercise is the top leisure activity in the USA in terms of participation with close to 100 million people taking part in 2008!
  • Demographically speaking, the participants skew older & female; the top age segment is 45-64 years old.
  • Walking shoes represent the top footwear category in the USA and the demographics (not surprisingly) map closely with walkers.
  • ‘Walking shoes’ should be part of your keywording strategy since they are a high volume search query
  • Top related keywords are: “exercise, weight loss, calories, walking shoes”

I think the demographic trends around walking are fairly clear. This lines up well with general demand for imagery around ‘active seniors’ and this is something I’ll dive into in more detail in the second part of this post. Stay tuned and comments and feedback are always appreciated!

Soccer: Search, Demographic & Stock Photography Trends

Posted on February 13th, 2010 in Analytics, SEO, lookstat, stats | 3 Comments »

Soccer was fourth on our top leisure activities list. I have written about soccer before, but this post focuses on:

  • Gender and Demographic Trends for Soccer in the USA
  • Why 2010 is going to be a big year for Soccer Stock
  • Top Search Keywords
  • Stock Photography Search Results

2007 Participation by Gender

Source: Statistical Abstract of the USA

2007 Participation by Age Group

Source: Statistical Abstract of the USA

As you can see from the charts above, soccer in the USA is primarily a youth sport – 60% of participants are under 18 and the single largest age group is under 11. While it does skew more male than female, the difference is fairly small. Almost 40% of participants are female.

I decided to check out boys vs. girls vs. youth soccer to get a feel for the gender lines at that level and the results are interesting:

‘Girls soccer’ is searched for more often than ‘boys soccer’ by a factor of 2 and appears to be gaining in popularity. Definitely something to keep in mind when planning shoots & keywording.

Why 2010 is going to be a big Soccer Year? Two words – ‘World Cup’

The chart above shows Google Insights data for Soccer from 2004 to the present day. As you can see, there is a massive spike in a World Cup year. The tournament takes place every 4 years and the 2010 FIFA World Cup is being held in South Africa this year. The tournament runs from June 11 – July 11.

Top Search Keywords

The biggest surprise in the above list was the fact that ’soccer pro’ was the top term (after ’soccer’ by itself of course.) It’s not something that I would have intuitively thought to have as part of a keywording strategy. (One other tidbit: searches for indoor soccer peak in the winter.)

Stock Photography Search Results:

Initially, I was a little surprised to see Fotolia with the most results (normally it’s Shutterstock) but given that Fotolia is based in Europe, with traffic patterns to match, this makes perfect sense. This also explains Dreamstime’s large soccer collection as well.

Links to Search Results from Other sites:

Conclusions

  • 2010 should be a good year for soccer stock, driven by the World Cup. You should find ways to incorporate this into your shoots & metadata.
  • World Cup related images are already beginning to pop up in stock photography search results.
  • In the USA, youth soccer and specifically girls soccer are important (Ellen mentioned this on my last soccer post.)
  • This is an obvious point, but make sure you have soccer & football in your keywords.
  • Searches for indoor, youth & boys and girls soccer all peak in the October/November time frame

Another point to keep in mind, soccer & sport in general aren’t always used literally. Concepts of competition, victory, power are all important advertising themes that athletics can illustrate.

The IPTC Fields That Matter for Search

Posted on January 26th, 2010 in keywording, lookstat, microstock | 3 Comments »

Which of Title, Description & Keywords matter for search? The short answer is:

“All of them”

Here’s why.

IPTC for Top 4 sites

As you can see from the table above, all of the fields have a role to play in either the Page Title or a site’s search. As a result, so you need to make sure that they all contain the top keywords for your image.

Page Title Tag
This is the sentence that shows in the top of your browser when viewing a web page. If you view the source of a web page, it is the <Title> element

Browser Title Screenshot

TheĀ  Page Title Tag is the most important on-page factor from a search crawler’s perspective. As a result, the words in your title tag are crucial for searches on Google and other search engines. Three of the four sites above use the IPTC title for their browser title tag and Shutterstock uses the description. So, regardless of what you think of them, those fields matter a lot. Even though iStock, Shutterstock and Fotolia ignore everything but the keywords in their search results, the fact that Google cares means you need to care.

Oh, one more thing – Dreamstime and Fotolia both have a character limit and truncate inputs. So, the bottom line? You have 50 characters in which to be relevant. Put your most important terms up front.

On-site Search
As you can see from the table, the microstock sites use some or all of the meta data fields in their search algorithms. I think we are all sold on the value of keywords, even for on-site search but Title & Description also have an important role to play. In fact, at Dreamstime, I think an exact match on title gets you the highest placement in search results (even above keywords.) I was able to get searches to return for words that only existed in the IPTC Title.

Talk is Cheap – Show Me the Searches!
All this becomes very clear with a few examples. I did a search on istock for ‘friendship’ and I picked the image highlighted below.

iStock Search Results

The title tag for this image is: “Two Women having Fun Outdoor (XXXL).” If you search google images for “two women fun outdoors”, this image is the second result. (This is a good thing.)

googleimagersults2

If you search iStock for “two women fun outdoors” the image is nowhere to be seen. While it has ‘fun’ in its keywords, it doesn’t have “two women.” And if you search for images on Google with keywords like ‘friendship’ you are not going to find that image.

Conclusions

  • Title, Description & Keywords should all contain relevant terms
  • Your page titles matter more than you think – for on site & for Google search; don’t ignore them
  • You have 50 characters for the title – make them count; put important keywords first

As part of our Back Office Services, we pay attention to these items. You should too.

Which IPTC Fields Matter & Why
The short answer to this is
ALL OF THEM
Here’s why. Each field has a role to play in Google search or on site search. As a result, you can’t ignore any of them.
[table]
Browser Title Tag
Three of the four sites I looked at use the IPTC title for their browser title tag. Shutterstock uses the IPTC description (potentially an interesting unique content SEO strategy.). This automatically means that you need to pay attention to your IPTC Title & Descriptions.
This is because the browser Title Tag <link> is the most important on-page factor from a search crawler’s perspective. As a result, the words in your title tag are crucial for searches on Google and other search engines.
So, even though iStock, Shutterstock and Fotolia ignore everything but the keywords in their search results, the fact that Google cares means you need to care. (Even if you don’t sell direct, Google drives traffic to stock sites.)
On-site Search
As you can see from the table, the sites use some or all of the meta data fields in their search algorithms. After experimenting with searches on Dreamstime, I think the title might actually be the most important field there. I was able to get results returned for images that had the words in the title and not the keywords.
Dreamstime and Fotolia both have a character limit and truncate inputs. So, the bottom line? You have 50 characters in which to be relevant. Put your most
Talk is Cheap – Show Me the Searches
I did a search on istock for ‘friendship’ and I picked the image highlighted below.
The title tag for this image is: “Two Women having Fun Outdoor”
If you search google images for “two women fun”, this image is the 2nd result. That is good.
If you search istock for “two women fun” the image is nowhere to be seen. While it has ‘fun’ in its keywords, it doesn’t have “two women.”
Conclusion
When keywording your images, you need to pay attention to all of the IPTC fields and you should make sure your most relevant search terms appear in your title, description and keyword. As part of our Back Office services, we make sure that we pay attention to not just microstock site performance but also SEO benefits. You should do the same

Keywording, SEO, & Fixing Your Page Titles

Posted on September 21st, 2009 in SEO, keywording, lookstat, microstock | 6 Comments »

Keywording images is not much fun, but it’s important. This is true whether you are selling your images through microstock sites, uploading them to your own website for direct licensing or to help with traffic and brand building. Keywords need to be relevant to ensure a good user experience – you don’t want someone to land on your page and be irritated because the image has nothing to do with the keyword they searched on. Cast a wide, but relevant net. It’s far better to have 100 people visit and 20 people buy than it is to have 10,000 visit and all of them leave.

Don’t Forget About Titles and Descriptions

If you care about SEO (and you should) then keywords aren’t the only items that matter. You’ll need Titles and Descriptions to maximize your chances of getting found via search. Remember to keep things concise, relevant and focused on what people are likely to be searching for. iStock had a great post on this very topic recently and I recommend reading it. The crux of the issue is to be literal and descriptive.

“Localized Rainstorm” is not a good title for the image above. Much better to go with the more descriptive “Dog Peeing on Fire Hydrant” that the photographer chose. Titles aren’t about being witty or making potential buyers smile, they are about making sure your image can be easily found when someone is searching for the subject of your image.

Fix Your Page Titles (The Best 15 minute investment you can make in SEO)

The single most important factor that you control for your SEO is the page titles. This is the string that displays in the browser window title area (above the URL) and is controlled by the <Title> element. It is crucial that you select titles that contain high relevance search terms.

There are a ton of images online that may have keywords, but have the image filename in the title. This may come as a shock, but “DMC_33430934.jpg” is not a highly used search term for a picture of the Golden Gate Bridge at Sunset.

If you’re interested in learning more about page titles and ranking factors, check out the results of this survey on SEOmoz. Titles & Keywords are the top 2 factors listed.

There is no magic SEO bullet and it’s a process of continuous improvement. Having said that, fixing your title tags is a relatively straightforward thing to do and has a concrete benefit. (The time consuming part is making sure your images have good titles & keywords.)

Image Title First – Your Brand Second

Another important aspect to keep in mind is that you should lead with the image title, not with your own brand. The reason for this is that you want to rank highly for searches for ‘Golden Gate Bridge’ – you already rank highly for the name of your business.

As a result, “Golden Gate Bridge at Sunset Stock Photo | Eye Rock Photography” is generally better than having your business name at the front. This is even true on your home page. In general, a guiding principle with SEO is that you want to rank highly for your concept/category where possible. Those who know your name already know how to find you.

You can see this good examples of this use of “Keywords | Brand” in action at a range of sites around the web including:

In general, as long as you have the keywords somewhere in the title, you’re ok, but having them listed first is generally considered the best approach. (Screenshot below is from the results of the SEOmoz survey mentioned earlier.)

My Images Sell Themselves

After someone arrives at your site, this is true. At that point, it is all about the image. To get people there, however, you need to make that image’s page visible to a search engine crawler. Today’s crawlers are text driven and need to be told what the page is about. Without a title, description and keywords, your images are effectively invisible.

Good keywording is critical if your images are online in any capacity whatsoever. Whether you are licensing them through microstock sites, your own website, or merely sharing them online to get them noticed, the words you use to describe them matter.

Keywords in Spreadsheets Don’t Count – Embed them in the Image

Keywords that live in spreadsheets are of no use to your images when they are online. They need to be embedded in the image file itself so that the metadata travels with the image. Microstock sites use IPTC Title, Description and Keyword fields to describe images and SEO-aware web services for image archive/display and sales, like PhotoShelter, will read these fields as well. Most photo editing and collection management applications will have ways of editing the image IPTC fields effectively.

We Can Help

As part of our Back Office Services, we offer IPTC-embedded keywording and SEO friendly titles and descriptions. If you’re interested in learning more, please contact us and we’ll get back to you to discuss your requirements.