Cool Post on Mashable about Profile Pics & Online Dating Responses

Posted on January 20th, 2010 in Uncategorized | No Comments »

It’s not stock photography, but Mashable has an interesting post about profile pics and dating responses on OKCupid. The post is about profile pics and stats; the results will probably surprise you.

The myths:

  • It’s Better to Smile
  • Phone & Webcam Photos are Creepy
  • Leave Something to the Imagination
  • Let them see you face

As always, pay attention to the numbers!

Also, here’s the the original post on OKCupid (nice work & great post!)

Microstock Photography Stats – Earnings and Downloads from 2002-2009

Posted on January 5th, 2010 in Uncategorized | 5 Comments »

Happy New Year everyone! We’ve been crunching through millions of microstock transactions and over the next few weeks will be sharing some of our findings. Here is an annual summary of earnings, downloads and earnings per download from 2002 to 2009.

Earnings and Downloads from 2002 – 2009

Microstock Stats: Earnings & Downloads from 2002-2009

I think some of the key takeaways from this chart are:

  • Strong growth in total earnings and downloads overall
  • Rapid expansion in Earnings per Download
  • Significantly slower rate of growth in Downloads from 2008-2009
  • I can’t wait to see what will happen in 2010!

Your opinion of microstock will determine how you interpret this data. On the one hand, it is true that the heady growth rates of the early years are no longer present today. On the other hand, this is somewhat normal and expected as an industry expands. Also, from a business perspective, the fact that you can raise prices and move more units, especially during a downturn, is very impressive. Regardless of your point of view, 2010 is going to be a fascinating year.

I’d love to hear your perspectives and predictions in the comments. We’ll be diving into more data shortly, so stay tuned.

Two great posts on search keywords & seasonality (via Microstock Insider)

Posted on December 1st, 2009 in Uncategorized | 1 Comment »

Steve Gibson (@microstockin on Twitter) at Microstock Insider has a couple of great posts up that are well worth your time. The first is a post about popular search keywords and the second, from last year, is about seasonal stock images.

Lots of good data and exploration of the relationship between popular searches/data on Google vs. search data from a free stock site that Steve has access to. He concludes that the correlation is quite high, but there are likely to be situations where the two diverge. I think this is absolutely true. Not every search query makes sense on microstock.

Having said, that, I think it’s important to remember that just because a topic isn’t well covered already, it doesn’t mean that there isn’t demand for it. The beauty of microstock is that it is possible to test the waters by shooting some more experimental concepts and examining the results in views and sales. PicNiche can also help you figure this out.

In general, if people are looking for something, there’s a high likelihood that marketers will try and advertise it to them. (Of course, you have to figure out where in the long tail you are operating to figure out how much to invest in that image.)

5 Ways to Improve Your Photography with Stats

Posted on May 20th, 2009 in Uncategorized | 14 Comments »

This is a guest post by Rasmus Rasmussen who among other things (listed in his more official bio below) is the author of The Microstock Guide, the creator of the Stock Photo Concept generator and is an all around great guy. Thanks for sharing your thoughts! (Also, all the photography in this post is his.)

5 Ways to Improve your Photography with Stats
I am a stat whore. To a certain extent, I think most of us are. People who follow sports often obsess over the performance stats of their favorite leagues, teams and individual players. They call it trivia. As a microstock photographer however, it can be so much more than that.

For us it’s a tool. Here is a list of some of the ways statistics can help us microstockers perform better.

Watch for trends, seasonal and otherwise

By keeping up with your stats, you will notice when the clients are busy working on upcoming holidays for instance. Christmas advertisements are typically not created in December, but in advance. If you shoot anything seasonal, use your stats to figure out when to upload, so your images will be fresh and timed just right.

You can also watch for declining trends, like when certain lighting styles become popular or when hairstyles change.

Find models that work
Comparing top selling images across models is a very good way to check their individual performance. If one of your models sell significantly more than the rest, or vice versa, you can book your next sessions accordingly.

Next, if you compare all your top performing models, you can start to look for patterns, similarities and other indicators of the usefulness of these particular shots.

Find props, lighting and locations that work
Sometimes the models are not as important as everything else in the shot. I’m sure still life and landscape photographers would agree. Again by comparing individual shots in a series, and top selling shots across multiple photo sesssions, you can look for similarities. Maybe a certain lighting setup works better than another one you’ve tried, or a certain location you’ve shot at.

Based on this knowledge, you can re-use successful elements in new ways, combine them differently and avoid those that seem to lessen the commercial value of your imagery.

Hone your concepts
Good stock photography is often concept based. You start with a basic idea, and you build on it and add to it using different poses, props, post-processing techniques etc. Some results will be strong and sell well, but the ones that don’t are actually more interesting. When an entire photo series fails to perform, compare it to similar ones that did well and look for differences. Maybe you overdid the make-up or left out vital elements. Maybe your problem lies in how you keyword your images, and not in the concepts at all!

Take note of these things, as you analyze your sales, and eventually your overall hit rate is bound to go up.

Calculate the ROI of your shoots
Return on Investment or ROI is a fancy way of saying: Is it worth it? If you are a serious microstocker, you will want strong shots that make it worth your time. Getting a professional looking image often requires direct financial investments covering anything from equipment and studio renting to hiring stylists, models or assistants. Not to mention all the time you put into organizing, executing and post processing the shoot. Using sales stats, you can easily add up how much you’ve earned per shoot.

If after one year, you have made more from your sales, than you invested into the photo session in question, I would call it a successful shoot. And if not, take the opportunity to figure out what went wrong.

About theprint
Rasmus shoots primarily urban lifestyle portraits and has been active in microstock since 2000, the last few years as an image inspector for iStockphoto. He is the author of “The Microstock Photographer’s Guide” and also does one-on-one coaching for photographers looking to get established in microstock. When he’s not involved with photography, he writes novels, music and lives the Bohemian lifestyle. His own microstock portfolio lives on iStockphoto, he blogs at rasmusrasmussen.com and is an avid Twitter user.