Comments on: Microstock Photography Stats – Senior Couples Indoors vs. Outdoors http://blog.lookstat.com/2010/05/13/microstock-photography-stats-senior-couples-indoors-vs-outdoors/ Microstock Analytics, Keywording, and Uploading Mon, 23 May 2011 21:59:34 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Paul http://blog.lookstat.com/2010/05/13/microstock-photography-stats-senior-couples-indoors-vs-outdoors/comment-page-1/#comment-11436 Paul Thu, 13 May 2010 22:10:13 +0000 http://blog.lookstat.com/?p=1122#comment-11436 Apologies for an incorrect figure...the artist has had 180,000 downloads, but I still can't figure out how you get such figures for an average per image Apologies for an incorrect figure…the artist has had 180,000 downloads, but I still can't figure out how you get such figures for an average per image

]]> By: Rahul Pathak http://blog.lookstat.com/2010/05/13/microstock-photography-stats-senior-couples-indoors-vs-outdoors/comment-page-1/#comment-11435 Rahul Pathak Thu, 13 May 2010 22:09:18 +0000 http://blog.lookstat.com/?p=1122#comment-11435 Hi Paul, These were two representative images for the set of indoor vs. outdoor. The aggregate data refers to data collected from the Top 60 (top 20 on DT, FT, IS). Sorry if this was unclear. I'll be more careful in the future. The stats are not stats for those images; but rather for all the indoor images of couples in the Top 60 images. Hopefully that makes more sense. Rahul Hi Paul,

These were two representative images for the set of indoor vs. outdoor. The aggregate data refers to data collected from the Top 60 (top 20 on DT, FT, IS). Sorry if this was unclear. I'll be more careful in the future.

The stats are not stats for those images; but rather for all the indoor images of couples in the Top 60 images.

Hopefully that makes more sense.

Rahul

]]> By: Paul http://blog.lookstat.com/2010/05/13/microstock-photography-stats-senior-couples-indoors-vs-outdoors/comment-page-1/#comment-11434 Paul Thu, 13 May 2010 22:06:20 +0000 http://blog.lookstat.com/?p=1122#comment-11434 The indoor image is a far more natural and spontaneous moment than the outdoor one and not surprising that it sells well...interesting that after doing a Tin Eye search I found that the outdoor image is no longer available on Getty and is available on iStock but that particular images is listed as having 3 downloads...where are you getting the download figures in the several hundreds from? The indoor image is from a series of 162 images and at an average of 944 downloads per image the total becomes 152,928 yet the artist has had a total of 18000 downloads. I'm confused. The indoor image is a far more natural and spontaneous moment than the outdoor one and not surprising that it sells well…interesting that after doing a Tin Eye search I found that the outdoor image is no longer available on Getty and is available on iStock but that particular images is listed as having 3 downloads…where are you getting the download figures in the several hundreds from? The indoor image is from a series of 162 images and at an average of 944 downloads per image the total becomes 152,928 yet the artist has had a total of 18000 downloads. I'm confused.

]]>