<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Soccer: Search, Demographic &amp; Stock Photography Trends</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.lookstat.com/2010/02/13/soccer-search-demographic-stock-photography-trends/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.lookstat.com/2010/02/13/soccer-search-demographic-stock-photography-trends/</link>
	<description>Microstock Analytics, Keywording and Uploading</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 03:08:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rahul Pathak</title>
		<link>http://blog.lookstat.com/2010/02/13/soccer-search-demographic-stock-photography-trends/comment-page-1/#comment-10941</link>
		<dc:creator>Rahul Pathak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 19:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lookstat.com/?p=828#comment-10941</guid>
		<description>Hi Pete, 
 
Thanks for your comment. I would expect Getty &amp; Corbis to have fewer results than microstock sites. I do think it&#039;s instructive to compare them to each other though. As for more selective, I think that may be true but I don&#039;t think higher quality is a fair statement any more. 
 
One interesting question (that I don&#039;t know the answer to) is whether Getty &amp; Corbis would take more creative stock images of soccer if they were submitted. i.e. do they think they have enough, or do they wish they had more of them. 
 
I appreciate your taking the time to write. Would love you hear more of your thoughts. 
 
Rahul </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Pete, </p>
<p>Thanks for your comment. I would expect Getty &amp; Corbis to have fewer results than microstock sites. I do think it&#039;s instructive to compare them to each other though. As for more selective, I think that may be true but I don&#039;t think higher quality is a fair statement any more. </p>
<p>One interesting question (that I don&#039;t know the answer to) is whether Getty &amp; Corbis would take more creative stock images of soccer if they were submitted. i.e. do they think they have enough, or do they wish they had more of them. </p>
<p>I appreciate your taking the time to write. Would love you hear more of your thoughts. </p>
<p>Rahul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://blog.lookstat.com/2010/02/13/soccer-search-demographic-stock-photography-trends/comment-page-1/#comment-10885</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 09:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lookstat.com/?p=828#comment-10885</guid>
		<description>Very interesting research. Thanks for sharing. This may be an obvious question but: Do Corbis and Getty have fewer results because they are more selective... Fewer images but higher quality? Just curious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting research. Thanks for sharing. This may be an obvious question but: Do Corbis and Getty have fewer results because they are more selective&#8230; Fewer images but higher quality? Just curious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rahul Pathak</title>
		<link>http://blog.lookstat.com/2010/02/13/soccer-search-demographic-stock-photography-trends/comment-page-1/#comment-10612</link>
		<dc:creator>Rahul Pathak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 06:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lookstat.com/?p=828#comment-10612</guid>
		<description>The participant numbers on the chart are in &#039;000s so when the label says 8,000 it actually refers to 8 million participants. Sorry for the confusion. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The participant numbers on the chart are in &#039;000s so when the label says 8,000 it actually refers to 8 million participants. Sorry for the confusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter</title>
		<link>http://blog.lookstat.com/2010/02/13/soccer-search-demographic-stock-photography-trends/comment-page-1/#comment-10550</link>
		<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 12:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lookstat.com/?p=828#comment-10550</guid>
		<description>what do you mean in the graphs 8,000 participents?????????? 
in what specific area?????? 
cant be the whole usa....... 
it doesnt mension anything....... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what do you mean in the graphs 8,000 participents??????????<br />
in what specific area??????<br />
cant be the whole usa&#8230;&#8230;.<br />
it doesnt mension anything&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rahul Pathak</title>
		<link>http://blog.lookstat.com/2010/02/13/soccer-search-demographic-stock-photography-trends/comment-page-1/#comment-7965</link>
		<dc:creator>Rahul Pathak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 22:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lookstat.com/?p=828#comment-7965</guid>
		<description>Yes, I do. My mistake for not clarifying. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I do. My mistake for not clarifying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: melastmohican</title>
		<link>http://blog.lookstat.com/2010/02/13/soccer-search-demographic-stock-photography-trends/comment-page-1/#comment-7964</link>
		<dc:creator>melastmohican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 22:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lookstat.com/?p=828#comment-7964</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s soccer??? Do you mean football? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#039;s soccer??? Do you mean football?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis Santos</title>
		<link>http://blog.lookstat.com/2010/02/13/soccer-search-demographic-stock-photography-trends/comment-page-1/#comment-7931</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis Santos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 10:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lookstat.com/?p=828#comment-7931</guid>
		<description>thanks for sharing once more :) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for sharing once more <img src='http://blog.lookstat.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
