<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Tale of Two Sites</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.lookstat.com/2010/02/12/a-tale-of-two-sites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.lookstat.com/2010/02/12/a-tale-of-two-sites/</link>
	<description>Microstock Analytics, Keywording, and Uploading</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 21:59:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rahul Pathak</title>
		<link>http://blog.lookstat.com/2010/02/12/a-tale-of-two-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-7901</link>
		<dc:creator>Rahul Pathak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 05:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lookstat.com/?p=819#comment-7901</guid>
		<description>Great post, Sean. Makes perfect sense to me that broader licensing rights and higher levels of support cost more. Also, I see that I commented on your post a year ago too :) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, Sean. Makes perfect sense to me that broader licensing rights and higher levels of support cost more. Also, I see that I commented on your post a year ago too <img src='http://blog.lookstat.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Locke</title>
		<link>http://blog.lookstat.com/2010/02/12/a-tale-of-two-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-7897</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Locke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 04:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lookstat.com/?p=819#comment-7897</guid>
		<description>Oddly enough, just a year ago, I wrote a similar blog posting on value for your money: &lt;a href=&quot;http://seanlockedigitalimagery.wordpress.com/2009/02/20/the-right-value-for-your-money/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://seanlockedigitalimagery.wordpress.com/2009...&lt;/a&gt; 
 
Same conclusion :) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oddly enough, just a year ago, I wrote a similar blog posting on value for your money: <a href="http://seanlockedigitalimagery.wordpress.com/2009/02/20/the-right-value-for-your-money/" target="_blank">http://seanlockedigitalimagery.wordpress.com/2009&#8230;</a> </p>
<p>Same conclusion <img src='http://blog.lookstat.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rahul Pathak</title>
		<link>http://blog.lookstat.com/2010/02/12/a-tale-of-two-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-7838</link>
		<dc:creator>Rahul Pathak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 19:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lookstat.com/?p=819#comment-7838</guid>
		<description>Hi Daniel, 
 
Good points below. Vetta is not open to all comers by any means. I think I was more focused on the fact that it&#039;s just more evidence of convergence. I do think that Getty only RF photographers can be iStock exclusives, but don&#039;t quote me on that. 
 
As for the yoga &amp; running updates. Glad you&#039;re finding those useful. There will be more coming regularly. 
 
Cheers, 
 
Rahul </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Daniel, </p>
<p>Good points below. Vetta is not open to all comers by any means. I think I was more focused on the fact that it&#039;s just more evidence of convergence. I do think that Getty only RF photographers can be iStock exclusives, but don&#039;t quote me on that. </p>
<p>As for the yoga &amp; running updates. Glad you&#039;re finding those useful. There will be more coming regularly. </p>
<p>Cheers, </p>
<p>Rahul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rahul Pathak</title>
		<link>http://blog.lookstat.com/2010/02/12/a-tale-of-two-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-7825</link>
		<dc:creator>Rahul Pathak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 18:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lookstat.com/?p=819#comment-7825</guid>
		<description>Completely agree on all accounts, Roberto. Also, you&#039;re right, it might have been possible to license the Getty image via other channels. I didn&#039;t thoroughly research that however. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Completely agree on all accounts, Roberto. Also, you&#39;re right, it might have been possible to license the Getty image via other channels. I didn&#39;t thoroughly research that however.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rahul Pathak</title>
		<link>http://blog.lookstat.com/2010/02/12/a-tale-of-two-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-7834</link>
		<dc:creator>Rahul Pathak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 17:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lookstat.com/?p=819#comment-7834</guid>
		<description>Hi Daniel,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Good points below. Vetta is not open to all comers by any means. I think I was more focused on the fact that it&#039;s just more evidence of convergence. I do think that Getty only RF photographers can be iStock exclusives, but don&#039;t quote me on that.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As for the yoga &amp; running updates. Glad you&#039;re finding those useful. There will be more coming regularly.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Cheers,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Rahul </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Daniel,</p>
<p>Good points below. Vetta is not open to all comers by any means. I think I was more focused on the fact that it&#039;s just more evidence of convergence. I do think that Getty only RF photographers can be iStock exclusives, but don&#039;t quote me on that.</p>
<p>As for the yoga &#038; running updates. Glad you&#039;re finding those useful. There will be more coming regularly.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Rahul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Laflor</title>
		<link>http://blog.lookstat.com/2010/02/12/a-tale-of-two-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-7831</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Laflor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lookstat.com/?p=819#comment-7831</guid>
		<description>Hi Rahul 
 
I find your research most interesting for the buyers, and not so much for most traditional RF-photographers. The reason being that you have to become exclusive to iStock in order to get your images into the Vetta collection (and into that high price bracket). You can&#039;t &quot;test&quot; Vetta. The move to iStock exclusivity is a huge step to take and takes a lot of faith and time for most macro people (bound by contracts). But I guess it could be relevant for photographers only shooting RF for Getty (assuming Getty allows them to go iStock exclusive with new images. I haven&#039;t looked into it). They won&#039;t have to see a massive drop in income until their portfolios start earning sufficient money on iStock. 
  
By the way thanks for the very useful Yoga and Running updates. Great work :) 
 
Yours sincerely, 
Daniel Laflor </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rahul </p>
<p>I find your research most interesting for the buyers, and not so much for most traditional RF-photographers. The reason being that you have to become exclusive to iStock in order to get your images into the Vetta collection (and into that high price bracket). You can&#039;t &quot;test&quot; Vetta. The move to iStock exclusivity is a huge step to take and takes a lot of faith and time for most macro people (bound by contracts). But I guess it could be relevant for photographers only shooting RF for Getty (assuming Getty allows them to go iStock exclusive with new images. I haven&#039;t looked into it). They won&#039;t have to see a massive drop in income until their portfolios start earning sufficient money on iStock. </p>
<p>By the way thanks for the very useful Yoga and Running updates. Great work <img src='http://blog.lookstat.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>Yours sincerely,<br />
Daniel Laflor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dmitry</title>
		<link>http://blog.lookstat.com/2010/02/12/a-tale-of-two-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-7830</link>
		<dc:creator>Dmitry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 14:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lookstat.com/?p=819#comment-7830</guid>
		<description>but how much money does the author gets on both sites?  Same percentage on both sites? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but how much money does the author gets on both sites?  Same percentage on both sites?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mystockphoto</title>
		<link>http://blog.lookstat.com/2010/02/12/a-tale-of-two-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-7824</link>
		<dc:creator>mystockphoto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 10:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lookstat.com/?p=819#comment-7824</guid>
		<description>Yep, the direction is marked out... and sometimes - I&#039;m saying sometimes - it&#039;s possible to find better and cheaper images on quality micro sites than in traditional RF. Just a note, you pay a premium for the exclusivity of the Vetta Collection, the Getty one could be licensed trough different channels. Or not? 
Cheers, 
       r. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, the direction is marked out&#8230; and sometimes &#8211; I&#039;m saying sometimes &#8211; it&#039;s possible to find better and cheaper images on quality micro sites than in traditional RF. Just a note, you pay a premium for the exclusivity of the Vetta Collection, the Getty one could be licensed trough different channels. Or not?<br />
Cheers,<br />
       r.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

