<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Istock&#8217;s Post on 2009 in review and 2010 Priorities</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.lookstat.com/2009/12/08/istocks-post-on-2009-in-review-and-2010-priorities/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.lookstat.com/2009/12/08/istocks-post-on-2009-in-review-and-2010-priorities/</link>
	<description>Microstock Analytics, Keywording and Uploading</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 03:08:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: LookStat &#8211; Official Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; More from Istock on there 2010 Canister Changes</title>
		<link>http://blog.lookstat.com/2009/12/08/istocks-post-on-2009-in-review-and-2010-priorities/comment-page-1/#comment-4266</link>
		<dc:creator>LookStat &#8211; Official Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; More from Istock on there 2010 Canister Changes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 22:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lookstat.com/?p=586#comment-4266</guid>
		<description>[...]    Istock&#8217;s original post on 2010 changes which we mentioned recently generated some controversy due to changes to their canister levels. They have made some changes and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]    Istock&#8217;s original post on 2010 changes which we mentioned recently generated some controversy due to changes to their canister levels. They have made some changes and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://blog.lookstat.com/2009/12/08/istocks-post-on-2009-in-review-and-2010-priorities/comment-page-1/#comment-4040</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 22:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lookstat.com/?p=586#comment-4040</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by lookstat: new blog post on @istockphoto &#039;s review of 2009 and 2010 priorities http://bit.ly/8hMe3q #microstock #stockphotography...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by lookstat: new blog post on @istockphoto &#8216;s review of 2009 and 2010 priorities <a href="http://bit.ly/8hMe3q" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/8hMe3q</a> #microstock #stockphotography&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rahul Pathak</title>
		<link>http://blog.lookstat.com/2009/12/08/istocks-post-on-2009-in-review-and-2010-priorities/comment-page-1/#comment-3962</link>
		<dc:creator>Rahul Pathak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 17:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lookstat.com/?p=586#comment-3962</guid>
		<description>Thanks for clarifying that. Much appreciated. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for clarifying that. Much appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: luis molina</title>
		<link>http://blog.lookstat.com/2009/12/08/istocks-post-on-2009-in-review-and-2010-priorities/comment-page-1/#comment-3938</link>
		<dc:creator>luis molina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 03:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lookstat.com/?p=586#comment-3938</guid>
		<description>Just to clarify, the split in &quot;main&quot; and &quot;exclusive&quot; collection with the higher prices in the &quot;exclusive&quot; will begin on January 7. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to clarify, the split in &quot;main&quot; and &quot;exclusive&quot; collection with the higher prices in the &quot;exclusive&quot; will begin on January 7.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rahul Pathak</title>
		<link>http://blog.lookstat.com/2009/12/08/istocks-post-on-2009-in-review-and-2010-priorities/comment-page-1/#comment-3929</link>
		<dc:creator>Rahul Pathak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 16:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lookstat.com/?p=586#comment-3929</guid>
		<description>Thanks for sharing your perspective, Tyler. I agree with you on the canister changes and I think that&#039;s playing out in the forums there. Never a dull moment in this part of the market :) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing your perspective, Tyler. I agree with you on the canister changes and I think that&#039;s playing out in the forums there. Never a dull moment in this part of the market <img src='http://blog.lookstat.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention LookStat – Official Blog » Blog Archive » Istock’s Post on 2009 in review and 2010 Priorities -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.lookstat.com/2009/12/08/istocks-post-on-2009-in-review-and-2010-priorities/comment-page-1/#comment-3919</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention LookStat – Official Blog » Blog Archive » Istock’s Post on 2009 in review and 2010 Priorities -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 09:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lookstat.com/?p=586#comment-3919</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Rahul Pathak and rmarinello, Jesper Elgaard. Jesper Elgaard said: RT @LookStat: new blog post on @istockphoto &#039;s review of 2009 and 2010 priorities http://bit.ly/8hMe3q #microstock #stockphotography [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Rahul Pathak and rmarinello, Jesper Elgaard. Jesper Elgaard said: RT @LookStat: new blog post on @istockphoto &#39;s review of 2009 and 2010 priorities <a href="http://bit.ly/8hMe3q" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/8hMe3q</a> #microstock #stockphotography [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tyler olson</title>
		<link>http://blog.lookstat.com/2009/12/08/istocks-post-on-2009-in-review-and-2010-priorities/comment-page-1/#comment-3920</link>
		<dc:creator>tyler olson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 08:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lookstat.com/?p=586#comment-3920</guid>
		<description>Yes, interesting indeed.  Most surprising that they didn&#039;t just add a canister level to the top - say Diamond Diamond :)  They have cut exclusive commissions - so i can&#039;t see too many exclusives liking this.   
 
I am also excited to see how the  exclusive plus collection works out and how they plan to market it.  A few agencies have tried this before and haven&#039;t had a lot of success with it, but iStock seem to be doing well with their Vetta collection. 
 
It will also be interesting to see if there is any truth to the image exclusive interpretations of the announcement some users have put forward. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, interesting indeed.  Most surprising that they didn&#039;t just add a canister level to the top &#8211; say Diamond Diamond <img src='http://blog.lookstat.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   They have cut exclusive commissions &#8211; so i can&#039;t see too many exclusives liking this.   </p>
<p>I am also excited to see how the  exclusive plus collection works out and how they plan to market it.  A few agencies have tried this before and haven&#039;t had a lot of success with it, but iStock seem to be doing well with their Vetta collection. </p>
<p>It will also be interesting to see if there is any truth to the image exclusive interpretations of the announcement some users have put forward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
