Microstock Goes to the Dogs (not the Cats)
Posted on October 20th, 2009 in Analytics, lookstat, microstock | 4 Comments »
We did an analysis of 2008 data for images with the keyword ‘cat’ vs. ‘dog’ to see how they did overall. It doesn’t matter what metric you look at, it’s not even close – dogs rule!
Image Volume
There were twice as many images tagged with the keyword ‘dog’ as opposed to ‘cat’ in our system. This is interesting when you consider that according to the American Vetinerary Medical Association, cats outnumbered dogs in the USA in 2007 (81 million cats vs. 72 million dogs.)

Royalties per Image
In addition to there being more images of dogs, they also earned more per image and were downloaded more frequently. Royalties earned per image for dog images were twice those earned by cat images.

Images of dogs also had 30% more downloads per image than those of cats.

Total Earnings
This translates to dogs earning over 4x more than cats in 2008.

I’m confident that dog-lovers everywhere knew that their beloved pets would come out ahead, but it’s nice to see it in the data. Let me know your thoughts and whether you see similar things in your portfolios. Also, if you’re interested in specific keywords, let us know in the comments and we’ll see what we can do.
(Full Disclosure: I am a dog owner, but since Casey has a cat at home, we are a pet-neutral company.)
Download your Free Guide Now!
4 Responses
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Rahul Pathak, Rob Davies. Rob Davies said: RT: @LookStat: microstock goes to the dogs (not the cats) – new blog post: http://bit.ly/dogsvcats #microstock #dogs #cats [...]
Nice one Rahul!
I wonder what can be the results for women vs men…. 10x ?
Cheers,
roberto
Thanks Roberto!
The men vs. women thing is definitely something we should figure out. 10x may be conservative
How cute: A pet-neutral company. Never heard that before. And yes, the man/woman ratio would be really interesting.